Methodology

How every verdict is built.

A public methodology for the same reason we cite our sources: research is only as trustworthy as the process behind it.

Research to verdict

From raw data to a clear decision.

Four stages. Each one cites what we know, what we do not know, and how confident we are. Click any step to read the full method.

Step 01
Collect
AI research agents gather project brochures, RERA filings, municipal records, court notices, market indices and builder dossiers.
Evidence
Every data point is tagged to a primary source and a retrieval date.
Limitation
Some municipal records are published with delays of several weeks.
Step 02
Verify
Claims are cross checked against original documents. Contradictions between a builder statement and a public filing are flagged, not ignored.
Evidence
RERA registration numbers, land use maps and litigant names are matched before inclusion.
Limitation
Verdicts reflect the latest available public record, not hidden private agreements.
Step 03
Synthesize
Findings across the eight pillars are weighted and reconciled into a single confidence range with reasoning written in plain language.
Evidence
Each pillar score is derived from multiple independent signals, never from one source alone.
Limitation
Synthesis is probabilistic; edge cases may require an analyst to review manually.
Step 04
Decide
You receive a clear verdict, cited evidence, confidence range and the key risks to consider before signing a cheque.
Evidence
Final reports include a source list, timestamp and the specific questions the research answered.
Limitation
A verdict is research, not legal or investment advice. Always consult a qualified professional.

Research methodology

Draft with AI. Verify with sources. Review with humans.

Our methodology is public because our business depends on it being defensible.

Collect

AI research agents pull from RERA portals, municipal filings, court records, published market indices and our proprietary builder dossiers. Every claim is bound to a source.

Verify

Findings across the eight pillars are reconciled against one another. Contradictions, such as a builder claim vs an RERA filing, are flagged, not smoothed over.

III

Synthesize

Signals from every pillar are weighted and reconciled into a single confidence range. No pillar is allowed to override the others without a documented reason.

Decide

A human analyst reviews confidence flags, legal amendments and edge cases. The final verdict carries a calibrated confidence range, not a false precision number.